3Dmark05, 3DMark06 and 3Dmark Vantage benchmarks of ASRock P45R2000-WiFi mainboard

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

3Dmark05, 3DMark06 and 3Dmark Vantage benchmarks of ASRock P45R2000-WiFi mainboard
Bluetooth 21 Jul 2008

Benchmarks - 3Dmark2005/3DMark2006

Paired with two pieces of AMD Radeon HD 4850 running in Single and CrossFire mode with Cat 8.6+patch. we tested out the board in a single and Dual 8x cross fire configuration.

In the single card configuration, the ASRock P45R2000-WiFi scored 18895, that is a very high score. In fact, when compared to the Gigabyte and ECS P45 boards, it is leading by almost 700 points. How did ASRock do that ? What about the other ASRock boards? It seems that the ASRock P43 also did very well at 18978 and ASRock's X48 scored 19022.

Let's take a look at CrossFire results. ASRock P45R2000-WiFi scored 21684, ECS P45T-A scored 21083 while Gigabyte GA-EP45 Extreme scored 21433. The ASRock X48TurboTwins-WiFi scored 21530.

From the scoreline, we can see that the difference seems to be substantial. Will this impact other scores in the other tests. Let's see.

In 3Dmark06, single card performance is 13098. This score is very similar to the 2 other ASRock boards scoring 13087, 13103. Something odd is that the P45 boards from ECS and Gigabyte scored 13032 and 13027. The difference is around a 100 points.

In CrossFire mode, the ASRock P45R2000-WiFi scored 18014, overtaking all the other boards in this test.

In 3DMark vantage, the score for the Performance is 7119. This is again faster than the Gigabyte and ECS P45 boards. In CrossFire mode, it scored 11634. The score is pretty good, considering that it is just 100 points lower than the Intel X48 version of the board.

Next >>>