|
|
|
|
中文版 | News | Archives | Reviews | Forum | $ Deals | Links | History | Contact | Privacy |
|
| ||||
Benchmarks of ECS 945GCT-D with Intel Atom
1.6GHz
|
| ECS 945GCT-D (Intel Atom 1.6GHz) Vista | ASUS Eee PC 900 (Intel Celeron 900 mobile) XP | MSI Wind (Intel Atom 1.6GHz) XP | ASUS Eee PC 901 (Intel Atom 1.68GHz) XP | |
| Memory Bandwidth | 2.2GB/1.9GB |
2.05GB/2.08GB |
2.84G/2.41GB |
2.8G/2.4GB |
| Dhrystone | 4035 MIPS | 2635 MIPS | 3846 MIPS | 3883 MIPS |
| Whetstone | 3343 MFLOPS | 2181 MFLOPS | 3321 MFLOPS | 3350 MFLOPS |
| Multimedia Int X8 | 29427 it/s | 8377 it/s | 29211 it/s | 29614 it/s |
| Multimedia Float X4 | 19898 fits/s | 9522 fit/s | 19769 fit/s | 20041 fit/s |
| Super PI 1M | 1 min 33 s | 1 min 27 s | 1 min 34 s | 1min 31 s |
| Random Access | 14.6ms | 0.5ms | 16.9ms | 0.5ms |
| CPU Utilisation | 0% | 2% | 3% | 2% |
| Average Read | 47.4MB/s | 28 MB/s | 38.7 MB/s | 26.7 MB/s |
| PCMark Vantage | 932marks | - | - | - |
As we tested the board using MS Vista, the results can't be directly used for
comparison with a system running Windows XP. Nevertheless, we can use it as a
reference and see if the board performs on par with the 2 atom notebooks we
tested before.
From the results, we can see that it performs just like the MSI wind U100. The Eee PC 901 is overclocked at 1.68GHz, thus we are not surprised that the results are better.
As we used an external HDD, we can see that the average read HDD performance is also way better than the SSD or the HDD in MSI wind U100. For application that requires random reads, this may not have an advantage, but for those applications that do a lot of read/write to HDD sequentially for big files, HDD still has an edge over SSD.
Next >>>
|
(C) Copyright 1998-2008 OCWorkbench.com
|
