中文版 | News | Archives | Reviews | Forum | $ Deals | Links | History | Contact | Privacy

Benchmarks of Gigabyte M912 Intel Atom N270 1.6GHz  versus ASUS Eee PC 901, Eee PC 900 and MSI Wind
 Bluetooth 19 Sept 2008

Benchmarks

We ran some basic benchmarks on the machine. This is because most of the benchmarks of today won't even run correctly on this processor. One such example is PC Mark05. Although this is quite a standard application to test system performance, it failed to complete the tests on both MSI WIND and EEEPC.

We ran some other standard benchmarks like Super PI, Sisoft Sandra XII, HD Tach etc. Here are the results.

HD TACH RESULTS

HD TACH Results

File benchmark of Sandra XII

Memory benchmark of Sandra XII

Processor Arithmetic benchmark of Sandra XII

Multimedia Benchmark of Sandra XII

Super PI 1M
 

Results Summary

 

  Gigabyte M912 (Intel Atom 1.6GHz) MSI Wind (Intel Atom 1.6GHz) ASUS Eee PC 901 (Intel Atom 1.68GHz) ASUS Eee PC 900 (Intel Celeron 900 mobile)
Memory Bandwidth 2.85G/2.16G

2.84G/2.41GB

 2.8G/2.4GB

2.05GB/2.08GB
Dhrystone 3897 MIPS 3846 MIPS 3883 MIPS 2635 MIPS
Whetstone 3353 FLOPS 3321 MFLOPS 3350 MFLOPS 2181 MFLOPS
Multimedia Int X8 29558 it/s 29211 it/s 29614 it/s 8377 it/s
Multimedia Float X4 20017 fit/s 19746 fit/s 20041 fit/s 9522 fit/s
Super PI 1M 1m 35s 1 min 34 s 1min 31 s 1 min 27 s
Random Access 18.1ms 16.9ms 0.5ms 0.5ms
CPU Utilisation 4% 3% 2% 2%
Average Read 51.1MB/s 38.7 MB/s 26.7 MB/s 28 MB/s


From the results, we can see that the Atom based machines all perform similarly in data crunching. The differences are largely due to the HDD used. In this case, the Gigabyte M912 does perform better in the disk performance tests. The Fujitsu HDD gives is an edge over the MSI Wind and Eee PC 901 (SSD) in terms of average Read. When it comes to random access, the SSD is no doubt the fastest and is noiseless.

 

Discuss in Forum

Next >>>

(C) Copyright 1998-2008 OCWorkbench.com

(C) Copyright 1998-2008 OCWorkbench.com