中文版 | News | Archives | Reviews | Forum | $ DealsLinks | History | Contact | Privacy

Futuremark 3Dmark05 3Dmark06 Results of Vvikoo 9600GT Turbo with Zalman's VF-1000 pure cooper cooler
Bluetooth 12 Mar 2008

Benchmarks

3DMark05

The Vvikoo 9600GT Turbo is factory overclocked at 700/1000/1750 for  GPU CLK/MEMCLK/Shader CLK whereas the at 680/925/1728 (GPU Core/Mem clk/Shader Clk). This will definitely perform better than any NV reference card that uses the original setting of 650/900/1625.

Using the QX9770 paired up with 2 GB Samsung DDR3-1066 modues running at CAS 7-7-7-20, 2T, the card is run in 3Dmark05 and 3Dmark06.

In 3DMark05, this card scored 19009 at it's factory default and 19531 when we overclock it to 805/1000. Although we can overclock to 810/1000, tearing begins to appear and it is relatively unstable unless we increase the PCIe voltage by +0.1v.

The same GPU Core ECS N9600GT-512MX-P performs similarly but it can't overclock as high as the Vvikoo 9600GT Turbo as it uses a passive cooler (with no fan).

If you notice, when it is overclock to 805/1000, the Vvikoo 8800GT MAX overclocked to 780/950 and Vvikoo 9600GT Turbo performs similarly.

3DMark06

The same test is done using 3Dmark06 as the benchmark. Vvikoo 9600GT Turbo scored 11914 at default and 12831 when overclocked. Both scores better than the ECS 9600GT card. This card lags behind when compared to the 8800GT series cards by around  4.4%


Discuss in Forum

Next >>>

(C) Copyright 1998-2008 OCWorkbench.com