|
| Extreme Overclocking, D2OL, SuperPi, 3Dmark Challenge In this sector, you can discuss abt softwares (no hacks/pirated stuff), benchmarking tools, latest softwares, Distributed Folding apps etc. |
Click here to resend forum activation email
Lost your password, Request it here
Future MRT MAP has MOVED here. Click here.
SHARE
[OCW PROJECT] Futuremark 3Dmark2003 Challenge Extreme Overclocking, D2OL, SuperPi, 3Dmark Challenge
13-09-2004, 11:32 PM
|
|
The one
|
|
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 184,113
Potenza rep: 10
|
|
Someone please update the top 10 charts.
|
14-09-2004, 08:28 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Tokyo/London
Posts: 408
Potenza rep: 23
|
|
Thanks Bluetooth for your encouragement and RavenX for your finding WinXP is better score than WinXP 64-bit. Got 12273 as a quick result here |
14-09-2004, 08:49 AM
|
|
Bronze Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 594
Potenza rep: 22
|
|
P4E 3.2
2x 512 Corsair XMS4000
I am using 61.76 drivers, the latest WHQL ones.
|
14-09-2004, 08:53 PM
|
|
Bronze Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 594
Potenza rep: 22
|
|
Oh and if you are wondering...
I have a BFG 6800 Ultra OC,(BFG is the best in my opinion, a lifetime warranty).
It is clocked factory at Core/MEM 425/1100
I have it clocked to 440/1300. That is what the Nvidia drivers picked as optimum, and there are no artifacts or tearing.
|
19-09-2004, 07:22 PM
|
|
The one
|
|
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 184,113
Potenza rep: 10
|
|
Can someone consolidate the top 10 scorers. Thanks
|
06-10-2004, 08:34 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 162
Potenza rep: 20
|
|
Update:
Update
Gondo 13207
Maverik-SG1 13057
Fredyama 11073
Bluetooth 9930
jhatfie 7622
__________________
IF it bleeds........we can kill it!<br /><br />I have a bad feeling about this....<br /><br />Thats great, thats just feckin great man...... game over!!.....game over!!!
|
06-10-2004, 08:37 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 162
Potenza rep: 20
|
|
New Score for me:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3212694
Update to follow - Gondo, looks like you have a bit of work to do, not much, but this is such a tough test to do better on.
Has anyone run tests on 3dmark05 default yet? I have using the hotfix V1.1 patch - scored 5401 points, not even in top 80!! DAMN it's tough, even running at 415/1200
__________________
IF it bleeds........we can kill it!<br /><br />I have a bad feeling about this....<br /><br />Thats great, thats just feckin great man...... game over!!.....game over!!!
|
06-10-2004, 08:40 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 162
Potenza rep: 20
|
|
|
Update
Maverik-SG1 13652
Gondo 13207
Fredyama 12273
Bluetooth 9930
jhatfie 7622
3dmark05 is a real killer, download update to v1.1 and let me knwo your results - may need another post for this one, don't hold your breath to score more than 6000 marks.
__________________
IF it bleeds........we can kill it!<br /><br />I have a bad feeling about this....<br /><br />Thats great, thats just feckin great man...... game over!!.....game over!!!
|
06-10-2004, 11:42 AM
|
|
Bronze Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 594
Potenza rep: 22
|
|
2005 is tough, I can't run the card over 425 without artifacts. These benchmarks are subjective though. I could run my card all the way to 460 and have horrible artifacting, but there is no way anyone else would know.
But I only post results that have no artifacts or tearing.
I am running the 6.6.7.2 drivers now, haven't tried it on 3dmark03 yet.
|
07-10-2004, 04:38 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 162
Potenza rep: 20
|
|
Yeah, if you post with artifacts then you are only cheating yourself, theres no way you can play games on it for any amount of time so whats the point.
Like Gondo, I only post stable results with no artifacts, I can run 415/1200 all day on UT2004 with no issues at all, this is the speed setting I use for benchies too.
Of course I am mighty chuffed with my achievements so far, but on the leaderboard at fuurmark I am no where near (outside the top 40) the top of the charts - but who knows what trickery they are using to get those results??
All I can tell you is I am running 270FSB, machII cooled 3.2Ghz P4 (4.3Ghz), with DDR550 CAS2.5 OCZ RAM, watercooled northbridge and an overclocked 6800GT - some of the other guys in the leaderboard above me have lesser machines but score well - I keep improving but am still way off the pace.
Perhaps they have benchmark optimised drivers?
Futuremark benchies usually favour AMD64/FX/ATI setups for some reason, either way they do not really relfect true gaming performance.
I also notice that there is not a big difference between stock and overclocked results for my setup. leaving me to believe that at 4.3GHZ my CPU is a bottleneck 
Just my thoughts of course, no axe to grind just saying what I see.
__________________
IF it bleeds........we can kill it!<br /><br />I have a bad feeling about this....<br /><br />Thats great, thats just feckin great man...... game over!!.....game over!!!
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
