Main Page | | English News | Reviews | Forum | US Price List | Facebook | History | Contact | Privacy | Site Map


Custom Search


Go Back   OCWorkbench | AMD ThreadRipper Review | Tech Investments forum > PC Problems, Mainboard and Graphics card troubleshooting > Graphics cards, HDD, SSD, DDR3/4 and Peripherals

Graphics cards, HDD, SSD, DDR3/4 and Peripherals Discussion area for PC Peripherals including graphics card, HDD, SSD, monitors, sound cards, ram etc

Click here to resend forum activation email
Lost your password, Request it here

Future MRT MAP has MOVED here. Click here.

SHARE


FX 5600?

Graphics cards, HDD, SSD, DDR3/4 and Peripherals


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-06-2003, 04:22 PM
Billr17 Billr17 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: US
Posts: 73
Potenza rep: 22
Billr17 is on a distinguished road
Question

I am ready to retire my trusty PCI Geforce 2 MX440 finally. I think I'm going to buy BFG Tech's Geforce 5600 256MB AGP 8X. I work at a retail computer store and get a good discount ;)

But first I want to make sure I'm correct in assuming it will work with my K7S5A. In the K7S5A manual it states the board has one AGP4X slot for a 2.0-compliant interface. Copied directly from BMG's site it says the features of the card include "AGP 8X (compatible with 4X AGP 2.0 compliant slots)". So I am assuming that the card will work with my 4X agp slot?!?!

Here is the link to the website: Asylum FX5600

Also what is the difference between the Ultra and non Ultra FX cards? Also has anyone else installed this card on a K7S5A yet and did you have any problems? Thanks guys.

- Bill
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-06-2003, 09:43 PM
Svente75 Svente75 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 434
Potenza rep: 22
Svente75 is on a distinguished road
Have a look into your manual and check if your AGP-slot is 2.0-compliant , then you should have no problems ...
But why do you wanna get such an earcracker ? ;)
Better spend the money on a Radeon 9500Pro with 128MB , faster and much more quiet ;)
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 10-06-2003, 10:20 PM
jonels jonels is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 167
Potenza rep: 22
jonels is on a distinguished road
Post

it should work fine as i've just installed a 5200, it's a very cheap card and had no probs whatsoever (rare i think in the computer world, i still can't quite believe it)

its extremely overclockable (mem speed clocked from 400 to 600)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-06-2003, 10:32 PM
RayvenX's Avatar
RayvenX RayvenX is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bath, UK
Posts: 5,211
Potenza rep: 27
RayvenX is on a distinguished road
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Svente75:
Have a look into your manual and check if your AGP-slot is 2.0-compliant , then you should have no problems ...
But why do you wanna get such an earcracker ? ;)
Better spend the money on a Radeon 9500Pro with 128MB , faster and much more quiet ;)
I'll second that... Get a Rad 9500pro while yous still can. The 9600pro is gonna be the only thing soon, and it performs worse...

Noooooooo... FXFlow=Evil... GeforceFX=Crap...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-06-2003, 12:04 AM
jonels jonels is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 167
Potenza rep: 22
jonels is on a distinguished road
Post

is the 9500 dx9 ?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-06-2003, 12:26 AM
Svente75 Svente75 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 434
Potenza rep: 22
Svente75 is on a distinguished road
Yes it is ...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-06-2003, 12:27 AM
OldGuy OldGuy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Alpha Quadrant
Posts: 301
Potenza rep: 23
OldGuy is on a distinguished road
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by jonels:
is the 9500 dx9 ?
Yes. Wich it is debatable if FX-5600 really is, at least with the current drivers wich seem to run just about everything a bit below DX9 specs.
Just make sure to get a R9500pro anyhow, the 9500 non-pro is that much slower.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-06-2003, 04:29 PM
Billr17 Billr17 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: US
Posts: 73
Potenza rep: 22
Billr17 is on a distinguished road
Post

How is the compatibility of the drivers with games? I'm not concerned with specs. I want to have a card that can actually be able to play games. I have previously owned 2 different Ati cards in the past which where unable to display games correctly. I went to Nvidia cards and since have never had any trouble getting a game to run and at least display properly. Honestly I am unhappy with my past experiences with Ati. I have not used any Radean card yet, so I would not know how these cards react while playing games. A card may be fast, but if it can't render graphics right then its no good to me.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-06-2003, 04:40 PM
OldGuy OldGuy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Alpha Quadrant
Posts: 301
Potenza rep: 23
OldGuy is on a distinguished road
Post

Yes, ATI sucked in the past. But they have steadily improved over the last couple of years and are now in level with nVidia. If not better, because all ATI drivers are Microsoft WHQL certified, wich few of nVidias releases ever are. Does help with system stability sometimes. I don't have more problems than nVidia users with my games either. And I get more performance and better image quality for the money too. Image quality gets quite important after you've gotten used to a high level.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-06-2003, 09:53 PM
Svente75 Svente75 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 434
Potenza rep: 22
Svente75 is on a distinguished road
And oc-ability is quite good ...
Mine can run stable @390MHz Core/324(648)MHz Mem ...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
nforce 1 and FX 5600 problem saint999 Graphics cards, HDD, SSD, DDR3/4 and Peripherals 8 13-07-2004 07:19 PM
which is better?? fx 5600 or ti 4200??? Fat_GuY Graphics cards, HDD, SSD, DDR3/4 and Peripherals 11 15-01-2004 11:24 PM
A7N266 VM and MSI 5600 krazyj ASRock (AMD Boards) 3 14-10-2003 10:12 AM
GFX 5600 vs. Radeon 9600 Pro kaiser soze Graphics cards, HDD, SSD, DDR3/4 and Peripherals 2 18-07-2003 11:57 PM
FX 5600? Billr17 ECS / PCChips 11 12-06-2003 04:42 AM


Mobile | Desktop

(C) Copyright OCWORKBENCH 1998-2018

All times are GMT +8. The time now is 06:14 PM.


Copyright OCWORKBENCH 1998-2017