ASUS K8V Deluxe Athlon 64 K8T800 Mainboard Review (4)

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

ASUS K8V Deluxe K8T800 Athlon 64 Socket 754 Mainboard Review (4)
Bluetooth 13 Nov 2003

Benchmarking

We check out the results for ZD Benchmarks using CC Winstone 2002 and Business Winstone 2001 in this section of the benchmark tests.

On The K7 series of boards, SiS boards always seem to have better throughput when it comes to disk access and this resulted in better overall performance in CCWS and BWS.

In CCWS 2002, we see that BIOSTAR K8VHA Pro scores 45.2 & Gigabyte K8VNXP scores 46.2 which is slower than the ALi ref board of 51.3 and the nF3 board score of 50.8. The IDEQ 200P scores 47 which is similar to the Gigabyte K8NNXP. The slightly lower score could be due to the lower FSB of 199.5MHz. ALi and NF3 leads by around 10% over the VIA K8T800 boards. ASUS K8V Deluxe, ABIT KV8-Max3 performs similar to the Gigabyte K8VNXP scoring a higher 46.6 points. Looks like the 8237 is still not as powerful as the ALi's South Bridge.

On Business Winstone 2001,the ASUS K8V Deluxe scores 83.6 which is average among the boards tested. We can see from here that both SiS and ALi ref boards still lead the way.

Next >>>