ASRock 4CoreDual-VSTA Review Benchmarks

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

ASRock 4CoreDual-VSTA Review Benchmarks - 3DMark06
Bluetooth 19 Nov 2006

Benchmarks - 3Dmark2006

Futuremark's 3Dmark 2006 is ran with the ASUS EN7900GT graphics card with Forceware 91.31. Below are the result break down.

As we have mentioned before, the VIA PT880Ultra chipset only support a 4X PCIe lane. When we pair up this board with the ASUS EN7900GT, we can immediately see the difference in performance in 3D tests.

Another observation is that, when we use DDR or DDR2, the difference is very little. Again, we see that DDR2 doesn't really bring much increase in performance on this board.

With a check in the CPU score, we can see that the Intel QX6700 score much better than the Intel X6800. A big difference of 54% is registered.

For Gigabyte GA-965P-DQ6+QX6700, Score is 5559, SM2: 2077, HDR/SM3: 2050, CPU Score : 3957
For Gigabyte GA-965P-DQ6+X6800, Score is 5323, SM2: 2086, HDR/SM3: 2048, CPU Score : 2568
For 4CoreDual-VSTA+QX6700 (DDR2), Score is 5167, SM2: 1965, HDR/SM3: 1843, CPU Score : 4010
For 4CoreDual-VSTA+QX6700 (DDR), Score is 5154, SM2: 1964, HDR/SM3: 1842, CPU Score : 3914

It can be seen that the benefit of using DDR2 on this board is just a bit faster than DDR. In fact, if we were to compare just the CPU score, the 4CoreDual-VSTA did well with a score of 4010.

Discuss in Forum

Next >>>